[Back] Enter a message, and generate a code:
There have been many problems with software in the past, and applications need to be more robust and provide much better integration with distributed applications. A major problem is that software applications have to interface to many different infrastructures, and it is often to possible to integrate with these in every occasion (Figure 5.1). This chapter outlines the future of software development with the .NET framework, which provides a completely integrated environment and should support applications which are uncrashable, and are portable and inherently secure. The migration towards .NET is likely be slow, though, but the future will be towards an operating environments which provides support for .NET and Java-based programs, and the other types of code being migrated out of the system, as they offer many problems and security weaknesses. Along with this, as has been seen in chapters 3 and 4, there needs to be more stronger support for the authentication of software components, and secure data storage/transmission, in order to enhance security. The authentication, thus, needs to be applied to users, devices and also to software components, where software libraries and components must authenticate themselves properly with hash signatures, and even with digital certificates. In this way, applications can be built using authenticated components. Along with this, authentication allows for the licensing of software components, as only authorized vendors will be allowed to use digitally-signed components. As applications are now increasingly using software components, and libraries, especially ones which could be distributed over networks, the requirement for properly authenticated components is increasing.
RDCEC DSFC LCCZ BSZW IEOLACBN XQRD NOTRXSEC QZ RDC ISNR, SZU SIIAQJSRQOZN ZCCU RO LC BOEC EOLHNR SZU IEOFQUC BHJD LCRRCE QZRCGESRQOZ XQRD UQNREQLHRCU SIIAQJSRQOZN. S BSYOE IEOLACB QN RDSR NOTRXSEC SIIAQJSRQOZN DSFC RO QZRCETSJC RO BSZW UQTTCECZR QZTESNREHJRHECN, SZU QR QN OTRCZ RO IONNQLAC RO QZRCGESRC XQRD RDCNC QZ CFCEW OJJSNQOZ (TQGHEC 5.1). RDQN JDSIRCE OHRAQZCN RDC THRHEC OT NOTRXSEC UCFCAOIBCZR XQRD RDC .ZCR TESBCXOEM, XDQJD IEOFQUCN S JOBIACRCAW QZRCGESRCU CZFQEOZBCZR SZU NDOHAU NHIIOER SIIAQJSRQOZN XDQJD SEC HZJESNDSLAC, SZU SEC IOERSLAC SZU QZDCECZRAW NCJHEC. RDC BQGESRQOZ ROXSEUN .ZCR QN AQMCAW LC NAOX, RDOHGD, LHR RDC THRHEC XQAA LC ROXSEUN SZ OICESRQZG CZFQEOZBCZRN XDQJD IEOFQUCN NHIIOER TOE .ZCR SZU YSFS-LSNCU IEOGESBN, SZU RDC ORDCE RWICN OT JOUC LCQZG BQGESRCU OHR OT RDC NWNRCB, SN RDCW OTTCE BSZW IEOLACBN SZU NCJHEQRW XCSMZCNNCN. SAOZG XQRD RDQN, SN DSN LCCZ NCCZ QZ JDSIRCEN 3 SZU 4, RDCEC ZCCUN RO LC BOEC NREOZGCE NHIIOER TOE RDC SHRDCZRQJSRQOZ OT NOTRXSEC JOBIOZCZRN, SZU NCJHEC USRS NROESGC/RESZNBQNNQOZ, QZ OEUCE RO CZDSZJC NCJHEQRW. RDC SHRDCZRQJSRQOZ, RDHN, ZCCUN RO LC SIIAQCU RO HNCEN, UCFQJCN SZU SANO RO NOTRXSEC JOBIOZCZRN, XDCEC NOTRXSEC AQLESEQCN SZU JOBIOZCZRN BHNR SHRDCZRQJSRC RDCBNCAFCN IEOICEAW XQRD DSND NQGZSRHECN, SZU CFCZ XQRD UQGQRSA JCERQTQJSRCN. QZ RDQN XSW, SIIAQJSRQOZN JSZ LC LHQAR HNQZG SHRDCZRQJSRCU JOBIOZCZRN. SAOZG XQRD RDQN, SHRDCZRQJSRQOZ SAAOXN TOE RDC AQJCZNQZG OT NOTRXSEC JOBIOZCZRN, SN OZAW SHRDOEQPCU FCZUOEN XQAA LC SAAOXCU RO HNC UQGQRSAAW-NQGZCU JOBIOZCZRN. SN SIIAQJSRQOZN SEC ZOX QZJECSNQZGAW HNQZG NOTRXSEC JOBIOZCZRN, SZU AQLESEQCN, CNICJQSAAW OZCN XDQJD JOHAU LC UQNREQLHRCU OFCE ZCRXOEMN, RDC ECKHQECBCZR TOE IEOICEAW SHRDCZRQJSRCU JOBIOZCZRN QN QZJECSNQZG.
This table shows the occurances of the letters in the text (ignoring the case of the letters):
This table shows how the text matches a normal probability to text (where 'E' has the highest level of occurance and 'Z' has the least). The grey rows show what would be expected for the order, and the red one shows what your text gives for the order: